Cursor focus

Terry Scott's Avatar

Terry Scott

27 Jul, 2010 09:14 PM via web

Before the recent updates, whenever I went back into an entry to edit it, the cursor would be at the last position I left it, i.e. the bottom of the entry. Now it is always at the top. It may seem like a trivial issue but when you have a long entry that you update a few times, it helped a lot when it was already where I wanted it to be, namely where the last entry finished.

Could this be changed in a future update?

  1. Support Staff 2 Posted by Oliver Waters on 28 Jul, 2010 08:06 AM

    Oliver Waters's Avatar

    Hi Terry,

    Thanks for your feedback - we'll take a look in to this ;)

    Cheers,
    Ollie

  2. Oliver Waters closed this discussion on 28 Jul, 2010 08:06 AM.

  3. Terry Scott re-opened this discussion on 08 Dec, 2010 01:20 PM

  4. 3 Posted by Terry Scott on 08 Dec, 2010 01:20 PM

    Terry Scott's Avatar

    Hi Ollie

    I notice from the recent upgrades that this hasn't been resolved but the
    discussion has been closed.

    Could you confirm if this is in the plan? It never used to be a problem in
    the early versions. I update entries quite a lot and it gets frustrating to
    tap the pencil to update, drag the screen to reveal the edit button, then
    drag the screen again to get to the bottom of the latest entry. It would be
    so much better to have the cursor positioned at the last used position.

    Can you please confirm.

    Regards

    Terry

    On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Oliver Waters <
    ***@tenderapp.com<tender%***@tenderapp.com>
    > wrote:

  5. Support Staff 4 Posted by Michael Waterfall on 09 Dec, 2010 08:18 AM

    Michael Waterfall's Avatar

    Hi Terry,

    Sorry there's been no progress here. While it cannot be a priority right now I will look into it and see if we can get it addressed soon.

    Best regards,
    Michael

  6. Michael Waterfall closed this discussion on 09 Dec, 2010 08:18 AM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.